|
 |
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Hi Harold
<p> I'm a violator! How can I sleep now?
<br> Seriously, my mistake was to brainlessly crop the
image in the wrong place while trying to reduce its size.
<br> It took 5h30m to render each image used to compose
the anaglyph. So, when I decided to put it in 640x480 I just cropped it,
instead of re-rendering. I'll be more careful next time.
<br> I think it took this long (2x 5h30m in a PII 350MHz
128Mb) because I insisted in using transparency, high refractive indexes
and high max_trace_level, while I could have used some simpler material.
<br>
<br> Well, take a look at my other image, the buckyball,
in this same tread ("a 'ghostless' image"), and tell me what do you think.
<p> Best regards,
<p> Ricardo
<p>Harold Baize wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Very good, I like it. Nice concept and well executed.
<p>A stereophotographer might complain that it violates
<br>the stereo window. That is a term 3D photographers
<br>use to describe the situtation where an object is cut
<br>off by the edge of the image. You can shift the individual
<br>left and right images inward to move things back into the
<br>window frame. Then things in the center can project out in
<br>front of the screen, but objects at the edge can fall just
<br>behind the vitural window frame.
<p>Harold
<p>"Ricardo Michel" <sil### [at] gbl combr> wrote in message
<br><a
href="news:39406D40.6C090D23@gbl.com.br">news:39406D40.6C090D23@gbl.com.br</a>...
<br>> Hi, people
<br>>
<br>> This is my first post here.
<br>> It's a humble contribution to "the diamond subject".
<br>> Pick up your 3D glasses and take a look at it
<br>>
<br>> (remember:
<br>> the left lens over your red eye...
<br>> or something like that)
<br>>
<br>> Ricardo
<br>>
<br>>
<p>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br>----</blockquote>
</html>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
